Sunday, December 6, 2009

Canadian command in Afghanistan grows with addition of U.S. troops

image


KANDAHAR AIRFIELD, Afghanistan -- A crack U.S. unit from the 82nd Airborne Division has been placed under Canadian command in order to "create a ring of stability" around Kandahar City before "the fighting season" kicks off again next May.
The 2nd battalion, 508th Parachute Infantry Regiment of the 82nd Airborne Division is to be deployed in the Taliban-infested district of Arghandab by Christmas, Canadian Brig.-Gen. Daniel Menard confirmed Wednesday.
However, the move into one of the most volatile parts of Afghanistan, which has been widely tipped for weeks, will come at a price. Brig.-Gen. Menard predicted that it would "easily lead to a 20% increase of [troops in contact] and indirect fire."
The number of U.S. forces has nearly doubled to about 2,000 in what Menard said will be "a super brigade" of about 4,600 troops. The size of the Canadian brigade may rise somewhat later next year as additional forces arrive from the U.S. as part of President Obama's surge.
The 1st battalion, 12th Infantry Regiment, based in Zhari, and a strengthened 97th Military Police battalion in Kandahar City are already under Canadian command.
"I feel extremely privileged that the Americans have offered those troops to a Canadian to command," Brig.-Gen. Menard said. "It is the trust they are giving me in order to be responsible for their sons and daughters. I will be as careful about their interests as I am for Canadians troops.
"I will, for sure, provide them with the greatest leadership that is available and we will certainly resource them in order to achieve the mission."
The move into Arghandab is connected to President Barack Obama's larger war strategy, which was backed by his decision Tuesday to send 30,000 additional U.S. forces to Afghanistan, pushing the number of American troops here above 100,000. But it may also be part of a larger U.S. strategy to convince Canada it should maintain its combat forces in Kandahar beyond a July, 2011 parliamentary deadline.
"This has been a long war and it is not over," Gen. Stanley McChrystal, commander of all alliance forces in Afghanistan, told a gathering of several hundred senior officers including Menard and his staff at Kandahar Airfield on Wednesday.
The four-star general, who is to be in Ottawa soon for high-level talks, cited statistics indicating that violence across Afghanistan had increased by 300% since 2007. Nevertheless, he was relentlessly upbeat.
"I have exceptional confidence right now," he said. "It will all be decided in the next two years.
"The south will be the main effort. I believe that by next summer the uplift will result in significant progress."
Canadian troops had responsibility for Arghandab for more than three years before handing it over to a U.S. army Stryker battalion in July, but they were never been able to operate there in large numbers because they had so many other tasks. The Stryker battalion is now being shifted to new duties securing the two principal highways across the province.
"Arghandab is a very difficult piece of ground," Menard said of a highly volatile sliver of agriculturally rich land that is really an outer suburb of Kandahar City. "West and east of the [Arghandab] river there are two different groups of people and two different sets of problems."
The Americans, known as the Red Devils, headed to Arghandab are already on their second tour in Afghanistan, arriving three months ago from Fort Bragg, N.C. Before getting their new battle orders, they had been scattered across Afghanistan training police.
As part of the new laydown in Kandahar, where many experts predict the war will be won or lost, by the end of the year, Canada will give up western parts of Zhari and Panjwaii -- where many of their troops have been killed since 2006 -- to a second Stryker battalion. But the Canadians will retain control of most of of those two districts, plus Dand District and Kandahar City.
As well as Arghandab, the Canadians are taking take charge of Daman District which lies between Kandahar Airfield and the city. Although they had often been called out to fight the Taliban in Daman, until Wednesday the area had officially been the responsibility of the Royal Air Force Regiment.
Since the first surge of U.S. troops in the spring, Brig.-Gen. Menard acknowledged that Canada's area of operations had shrunk considerably. One of the results was that Canada no longer had to make "911 calls" into areas where it never had enough forces to operate constantly.
Although these latest moves will, when taken together, slightly decrease the Canadian area of operations, Brig.-Gen. Menard noted that troops under his command would be responsible for terrain where "85% of the population of Kandahar lives."
Securing the provincial capital "is by far my priority No. 1," the Van Doo officer said, adding that "the mission is at a very critical point right now . . ."
"Having all these additional resources means we will be in a better position to hold the ground, to build and mentor and stabilize the area."

source: www.military-world.net

Militants Detained in Wardak, Khwost

image

KABUL, Afghanistan - An Afghan-international security force detained several suspected militants in Wardak province while pursuing a Taliban sub-commander today.

The joint security force targeted a compound near the village of Jamad Kheyl in the Sayed Abad district after intelligence sources indicated militant activity. The joint force searched the compound without incident and detained the suspected militants.

In another operation Wednesday, an Afghan-international security force detained a handful of suspected militants in Khowst province while pursuing a Taliban IED facilitator.

The joint security force targeted a compound near the village of Khatekah in the Sabari District after intelligence sources indicated militant activity. The joint force searched the compound without incident and detained the suspected militants, including the IED facilitator.

No shots were fired and no one was harmed in either operation.

ISAF Casualties

There were no ISAF fatalities in the last 24 hours in Afghanistan.

 source: www.military-world.net

Monday, November 30, 2009

'Don't Tell Me There Isn't a God'

'Don't Tell Me There Isn't a God'
LOGAR PROVINCE, Afghanistan — Maybe the Afghan kids shouting in the distance were telling the Soldiers to get out of their neighborhood.
Perhaps they were trying to warn the troops not to make that right turn.
Or maybe they were signaling the triggerman around the corner to blow up some Americans on a cold and damp afternoon.
But just as the men of 1st Platoon turned onto yet another muddy path, a bomb buried near an orchard gate detonated next to Spc. Burch Swigert.
The blast shook the platoon ahead of Swigert’s position. An Afghan soldier swung his rocket-propelled grenade launcher around to fire before the Americans shouted him down.
The platoon ran back toward the boom, only to freeze as screaming Afghan soldiers pointed out a second, unexploded shell where the bomb went off. To add to the tension, the unit was in a dead zone. Their radios could not reach help at Combat Outpost Charkh and the rest of Company B, 1st Battalion, 32nd Infantry Regiment.
Amid the shouting, there he sat. Swigert was having a cigarette against that same orchard wall, shaken, but with everything intact.
"I love you, Swigert!" a Soldier yelled as the lucky specialist got to his feet and moved down the path away from the blast site.
The bomb was made of 82 mm and 60 mm mortar shells. The larger shell blew up right next to Swigert as he walked by. But the 60 mm did not.
Despite its fearsome noise, the blast didn’t even knock the Helena, Mont., native off his feet.
"I was walking in front of the gate," Swigert said. "I heard a click and it went boom. First I thought my leg was gone, then I was like, ‘I’m still here.’
"If I didn’t know better, I’d say angels were watching over me."
The wiring of the bomb wasn’t very good, and the shell that did detonate was full of gunpowder and not its original explosives. Soldiers theorized that maybe the triggerman wanted to save those valuable explosives, or maybe he wanted to get paid to blow the bomb without hurting anyone.
Maybe it was all luck.
"Don’t tell me there isn’t a God, with some of the things these Soldiers have seen, and Swigert wasn’t killed," platoon leader 1st Lt. Kevin Cory said of the near-miss.
The triggerman had been able to see the blast point via a hole in the orchard’s opposite wall. He had no doubt watched many pairs of legs pass by before Swigert came along.
"If it would’ve went off right, it would’ve been a louder explosion," Spc. Jesse Rinier said after climbing a nearby hill in order to catch a signal and communicate with the base. "If it was the full thing, Swigert would’ve been dead."
Despite the head-scratching joy that accompanied Swigert’s escape, the half-baked contraption might signal an ominous development: Until this point, the frequent enemy engagements involved rifles and rocket-propelled grenades. No roadside bombs.
"I’m surprised it took them this long to actually do it," Cory said.
Right before the blast, Swigert said he was thinking about how he has only a month left, and of a squad leader who had been injured and evacuated, and how he couldn’t see over this orchard wall.
Now, Swigert just wants to get home and make some babies.
"It sure puts your life in perspective, what you’ve had and what you’re missing," he said. "I’ll put up with screaming kids and dirty diapers over IEDs any day."
©  This article is provided courtesy of Stars & Stripes, which got its start as a newspaper for Union troops during the Civil War, and has been published continuously since 1942 in Europe and 1945 in the Pacific. Stripes reporters have been in the field with American soldiers, sailors and airmen in World War II, Korea, the Cold War, Vietnam, the Gulf War, Bosnia and Kosovo, and are now on assignment in the Middle East.

Stars and Stripes has one of the widest distribution ranges of any newspaper in the world. Between the Pacific and European editions, Stars & Stripes services over 50 countries where there are bases, posts, service members, ships, or embassies.

Stars & Stripes Website
source: www.military.com

Monday, March 16, 2009

"Blackhawks" on the rise


By Capt. Camilla M. Swain, Bravo Det., 101st FM Co., 10th SBTB, 10th SBDE
Mar 13, 2009 - 6:20:00 PM


Blackanthem Military News
CAMP TAJI, Iraq - It has been nearly a month since Bravo Detachment, 101st Financial Management Company Fort Campbell, Ky. also known as the Blackhawks, landed here.

Bravo Detachment received short notice they were deploying and immediately assumed responsibility of their wartime mission. Upon arrival, Bravo Det. 101st FM Co., 10th Sustainment Brigade Troops Battalion, 10th Sustainment Brigade, without delay started training with its predecessor unit, Delta Det., 24th Financial Management Company, 10th SBTB, 10th SBDE. Within a week, Bravo Det. 101st FM Co. assumed responsibility of the finance mission here and at forward operating base War Eagle, providing direct support to both and area support to Sadr City and North Baghdad. The detachment consists of 22 personnel including three located at the finance office at FOB War Eagle. The Detachment holds each other accountable and pushes one another to be the very best they can be. Every section leader has at least two Soldiers enrolled in college and graduate courses, pursuing and continuing their education in addition to conducting the wartime mission.

Bravo Det. has serviced more than 5,000 customers. The Military Pay section picked right up where they left off from at Fort Campbell. The section consists of the Chief of Military Pay, Staff Sgt. Wilfredo Garcia of Carolina, Puerto Rico, and two Military Pay Analysts, Cpl. Lucrecia Ruffin of Ocala, Fla. and Spc. Jason Kucza, a native of Philadelphia, and two Military Pay Techs, Spc. Maribel Guerrero from Hollywood, Fla., and Spc. Christian Lemont, a Brunswick, Maine native. They have processed more than 3,750 transactions with a 99% accuracy rating. Staff Sgt. Garcia attributes their success to his "team and the level of expertise that they each possess, the chemistry that they share, and the smooth workflow of documentation. Every member of the team knows their place and their importance within the Military Pay section."

The Commercial Vendor Services (CVS) and Disbursing Section from both Camp Taji and FOB War Eagle hit the ground running and assumed the mission without missing a beat. These two areas require attention to detail and endurance with a smile. The CVS section, led by Staff Sgt. Leroy Hunter from Fort Campbell, Ky., said, "The key factors of our success manifests in the junior leadership. I am fortunate to have strong NCOs with research capabilities who stay in the DODFMR's. This is filtering down to the Soldiers who take pride in their work and find ways daily to exceed the standard. My section is a family first that cares about matters beyond the work place, thus ensuring mission accomplishment and beyond." His team members include two certifiers, Sgt. Felicia Burnett of Yazoo, Miss., and Sgt. Jason Cooley, a native of Cranston, R.I., and three CVS clerks, Spc. Brygette Harris of East Orange, N.J., Spc. Efrain Santiago from Sidra, Puerto Rico and Spc. Jonathan Campbell from Greensburg, Ky. Since arriving to

Camp Taji, his team has processed in excess of $3.3 million in contract and other miscellaneous payments.

2nd Lt. Katherine Palesky of Plano, Texas, heads the Disbursing Section at Camp Taji. Her team consists of Sgt. William Bungard, the section NCOIC and Columbus, Ohio native, and four cashiers, Spc. Deshon Massey of Flint, Mich., Spc. Emily Pelchat of Tavares, Fla., Spc. Amanda Tillotson from Braman, Okla., and Pfc. Xin Bi of Reading, Pa. FOB War Eagle is headed by Staff Sgt. Colbie Jackson from New Orleans. His team consists of a certifier, Spc. Daniel Valoaga of Fort Riley, Kan., and a cashier, Spc. Josh Lee, a native of Memphis, Tenn. These two sections have processed more than 5,000 transactions and disbursed more than $3 million since taking over the mission. They each attribute their success to their teamwork. Spc. Tillotson, cashier, states, "I personally enjoy a challenge and helping out fellow Soldiers. I have learned a lot in a short time along with the rest of the Disbursing squad, whom I am proud to work with. The Soldiers and civilians who come in the office often help to make us smile during a long and stressful day. We work very hard and the customers see that and respect us for our dedication. I think I am successful because I take pride in my work and our mission here at Camp Taji."

Within the last month, the Bravo Det., 101st FM Co. has fully grasped the mission and the service that we provide to Soldiers, Airmen, Sailors, Marines, Contractors, DOD Civilians, as well as Postal and AAFES. We look forward to serve Camp Taji and surrounding areas. Blackhawks on the rise!

ADDITIONAL PHOTOS:

(From bottom to top, left to right) The Bravo Detachment 101st Financial Management Company, 10th Sustainment Brigade Troops Battalion, 10th Sustainment Brigade Commercial Vendor Services section asking for more contracts! Spc. Brygette Harris of East Orange, N.J., Staff Sgt Leroy Hunter from Fort Campbell, Ky., Sgt. Felicia Burnett from Yazoo, Miss., Sgt. Jason Cooley of Cranston, R.I., Spc. Jonathan Campbell from Greensburg, Ky., and Spc. Efrain Santiago from Sidra, Puerto Rico. (Photo by Capt. Camilla Swain, Bravo Det., 101st FM Co., 10th SBTB, 10th SBDE)
(From left to right) Bravo Detachment 101st Financial Management Company, 10th Sustainment Brigade Troops Battalion, 10th Sustainment Brigade disbursing has balanced early! Spc. Emily Pelchat of Tavares, Fla., Spc. Amanda Tillotson from Braman, Okla., Sgt. William Bungard of Columbus, Ohio, Pfc. Xin Bi of Reading, Pa., 2nd Lt. Katherine Palesky from Plano, Texas, and Spc. Deshon Massey of Flint, Mich. (Photo by Capt. Camilla Swain, Bravo Det., 101st FM Co., 10th SBTB, 10th SBDE)

Protecting the community! Staff Sgt. Ryan Cunningham, FT Leonard wood, Mo., and Spc. Michael Long, a native of Naples, Fla., from the 252nd Military Police Detachment, 4th Infantry Division, conducts their daily checks with Disbursing non-commissioned officer in-charge, Sgt. William Bungard, a native of Columbus, Ohio. (Photo by Capt. Camilla Swain, Bravo Det., 101st FM Co., 10th SBTB, 10th SBDE)

source: www.blackanthem.com

The Iron Butterfly: Brown Water Warriors of Viet-Nam

River Division 593 was born on 1 May 1968, when Lt. William Straight and his men, then at Nha Be, RVN, received a message from Commander Naval Forces Viet-Nam activating River Section 544. Although Lt. Straight had no boats at the time, he started the process of setting up a new unit. On 4 May 68 the first three new MK-11 river patrol boats (PBRs) hull numbers 752, 753 and 754 arrived and Lt. Straight’s men took possession. Test firing the weapons began the same day, and boat trials started the next morning. On 17 May the final seven boats, hull numbers 755, 756, 761, 840, 841, 842 and 843 were received — 544 was now a complete section.

After only three months of operations as River Section 544, during which hundreds of hours had been logged on patrol, a major restructuring within Naval Forces Viet-Nam came about. On 1 Sep 68, with a new organization in place, River Division 593 emerged from an already legendary start and continued in the traditions of the great American “Brown Water Navy.”

Killer jungle

In the first months of operations, 593 was based at Nha Be U.S. Naval Base, and was assigned the task of patrolling the rivers and waterways of the Rung Sat Special Zone. “Rung Sat” in Vietnamese means “Killer Jungle” and had been a very bad area even before the United States became involved in Viet-Nam. The Rung Sat was of special importance to U.S. forces and their war effort because the main shipping channels from the South China Sea to the capitol of Saigon lay mainly in the Rung Sat. Its rivers and jungles were infested with Viet Cong guerrillas and North Vietnamese Army Regulars.

The Rung Sat was approximately 400 square miles and, in the monsoon season, 85% of it was under water. The eastern boundary was along the Thi Vi River (Song Thi Vi). It was known as the Thi Vi-Go Gia area because of the rivers and was very lush and green and provided many areas for the enemy to hide. The headquarters for all of the Rung Sat was in this area, but it was never found. The division spent many hours patrolling the area and it seemed that every day a patrol would be involved in a firefight that resulted in injury, death or, at least, damage to a boat. The western boundary of the Rung Sat was the Soi Rap River (Song Soi Rap). This river was largely defoliated on the eastern bank but, because the western bank was out of the Rung Sat, it was left alone. This side was a jungle maze of thick tropical growth that offered great cover for the enemy and served as a major staging area for attacks on Saigon.
This was the first area that we patrolled in the zone, and was where the legend began.

The division was moved from one side of the zone to the other and then to the Long Tau River (Song Long Tau); this was the major shipping channel from the South China Sea to Saigon and 60% of all the supplies for the war effort came up this river. The Long Tau flowed through the middle of the zone and was very narrow in several spots. If the enemy could have sunk a ship in any one of these areas it would have blocked the main shipping channel for a very long time. The division was on constant patrol on this river, and not one ship was ever lost to enemy rockets while the “Iron Butterfly” was present.

The division took its assigned task to heart and began cleaning up the area with a vengeance. Although several of the men were wounded in action during this time, it was not until 8 Nov 68 that the division had its first member KIA. During a firefight that afternoon, Chief Quartermaster Ted Smith was killed instantly when he was hit by an enemy rocket while aiding one of his men who had been wounded earlier. The death of Chief Smith had a sobering effect on the rest of the men, and everyone was more determined than ever to do the job.

In Viet-Nam, when one area became more important, units would be moved in to patrol it. This also came about when the enemy moved his main base of operations from one area to another; units were then required to move into the new area and patrol it. River Division 593 was one of the first divisions on the Vam Co Dong River (Song Vam Co Dong) when Operation Giant Slingshot began its stranglehold on Viet-Cong Communist aggressors and North Vietnamese Army supply routes from Cambodia to Saigon.

Giant Slingshot

The Giant Slingshot area was a wedge-shaped piece of land bounded by the Vam Co Dong on the north and the Vam Co Tay River (Song Vam Co Tay) on the south. The handle of the slingshot was formed by the Vam Co River (Song Vam Co), which was partially in our old operation area, the Rung Sat. The slingshot area was just north of the Mekong Delta and just below the famous Plain of Reeds; Cambodia was to the west. It was an easy two-day march from Cambodia to Saigon with a supply/rest stop in the wedge. This was why we were sent in; they wanted this pattern disrupted and the enemy to be denied this area for his operations.

The USS Harnett Country (LST 821) was moved up river from the South China Sea to the bridge at Ben Luc and was utilized as an operating base for 593 and a detachment of Seawolf helicopters. Ben Luc was a commercial center at the junction of the Vam Co Dong River and Highway 4, the main overland link between Saigon and the Delta area. The division remained on this operation from 12 Dec 68 to 25 Mar 69. During this time, Lt. Bill Straight was relieved by Lt. L.A. Bissonnette, and the division lost PBR 753 when it was hit by two enemy rockets during a firefight on 16 Feb. The boat burned out of control and, even with a gallant effort by its crew, it could not be saved and finally blew up. Luckily no one was killed in this action, but the division had already had one man killed on Slingshot. On 17 Jan. Engineerman Second Class Terry Simison was shot in the head by an enemy AK-47 round during a firefight and died on the medevac en route to the field hospital. So, when no one was killed on 753, everyone in the division felt relieved. This feeling would be short-lived because, on 17 Feb, the day after losing 753, Petty Officer C.A. McCafferty was hit by an enemy rocket during a heated firefight and was killed instantly.

The rivers and canals in the Slingshot operation area were narrow, to say the least. The banks were covered with thick, lush jungle and many bunker complexes were hid in the high banks and tree lines that bordered the river. The enemy had a stronghold there and did not want to give it up. Firefights were often, and brutal, and came with no warning. Charlie soon realized that the “Iron Butterfly” was as determined as he was, and that the ratio of dead he was giving up was too high a price to pay. Soon, the majority of enemy units bypassed the area, and firefights were less frequent. Over 50% casualties were suffered by the men of River Division 593 during its stay on operation Giant Slingshot so everyone was happy when word came down that the division was moving back to Nha Be on 25 Mar 69 and would, once again, be patrolling the Rung Sat Special Zone.

The idea of being back in the Rung Sat had not yet settled in when the Division had another member KIA. GMG3 Thomas L. Brown, forward gunner on PBR 756, was killed on the night of 9 Apr when an enemy B40 rocket flew out of the dark during a firefight and cut his gun tub in half. Petty Officer Brown was killed instantly.

During the months that followed, the Rung Sat Special Zone was again the operating area for the “Iron Butterfly,” the symbol of River Division 593 worn proudly on the right shoulder of every man in the division. There was no canal, no waterway, no corner of the Rung Sat Special Zone that the “Iron Butterfly” did not patrol in its relentless search and pursuit of the enemy. Another member of the division was KIA during this time. Petty Officer D.L. Tucker went down in a firefight on 6 Jul. Many other crewmen were wounded in countless actions against the enemy and the legend of the “Iron Butterfly” grew.

Reassigned

On 4 July 1969 River Division 593 once again received orders to move its base of operations. This time it was assigned duty in direct support of the U.S. Army 1st Infantry Division and the 5th Division of the Army of the Republic of South Viet-Nam on the upper Saigon River, where already strong traditions and legends would be built on, strengthened and renewed in the months ahead.

The “Iron Butterfly” showed her colors on both the Saigon and the Thi Tinh Rivers, and the close proximity of this operating area to the large enemy complex in the tunnels of Cu Chi more than guaranteed the division plenty of action.

The division remained in this area on joint and combined operations from 4 Jul to 26 Sep 69 and the results of the division efforts, as noted by Commander Naval Forces Viet-Nam and his Vietnamese counterpart, were astronomical. Over 200 enemy soldiers were KIA by division patrols. Several tons of enemy supplies, including many very important documents, were captured. Several major enemy offenses against the strategic bridge at Phu Coung were stopped before they could reach the area by division night waterborne guard posts. One of these efforts was perhaps the longest firefight engaged in by any naval unit during the war. This all-night action was led by the legendary Chief Bob Monzingo, the Iron Butterfly’s own rogue warrior, in the middle of September and resulted in several enemy dead and numerous supplies captured.

On 15 Sep, an eight-boat patrol left Phu Cong en route to support a company of the 101st Airborne. It was ambushed prior to making its scheduled link-up with the Army company. Several men on the lead boats, along with the Division Commander, Lt. Bissonnette, were wounded. One boat had over 50 holes in it from enemy fire. Although the patrol had to stop long enough to dust-off the wounded after suppressing enemy fire, the operation proceeded as planned. Lt. Bissonnette refused to be evacuated with the rest of the wounded until the mission was complete.

Because of the constant contact with the enemy, everyone in the division was looking a bit haggard and needed a rest. A sigh of relief was heard by everyone when, on 26 Sep, the division was moved back to Nha Be and the Rung Sat Zone because, even as bad as the area was, it was not nearly as bad as being on the upper Saigon.

This stay in Nha Be would be very short-lived; the division was back in Phu Coung in November 1969 working with several local Army units and patrolling the river night and day. In December ’69 Lt. Bissonnette was relieved by Lt. Alan Deroco, who was 593’s third commander. . . and its last.

Two more men of the division were killed in action during this stay on the upper Saigon. FN N.C. Estes was KIA on 17 Jan 70 and Gunnersmate Seaman Frank Jacaruso was killed on 12 Mar 70. He was also the last.

After another brief stay in Nha Be, the division was ordered to the Cambodian border to lead the American assault across. During April and into June of 1970 the division operated off of the USS Benewa (APB 38) and the YRBM-20 anchored in the Bassac River.

593 had been an active participant in the Vietnamese turnover program, ordered by Commander Naval Forces Viet-Nam and had received its first 11 Vietnamese sailors for training back on 26 Mar 69. In the 15 months that followed, over 100 Vietnamese sailors were trained by and fought alongside their American counterparts and friends of the “Iron Butterfly.”

On 30 June 1970 at Chau Doc, alongside the USS Benewa on YRBM-20, River Division 593 was turned over to the Vietnamese Navy. So ended the name with the lowering of the last American flag. . . but not the legend.

Medals

During its short 26 month history, over 200 men served in River Division 593 — all of them volunteers and all of them professionals. Seven courageous men of River Division 593 lost their lives while serving in Viet-Nam. Personnel of the “Iron Butterfly” were in action much of the time, and were decorated often. Medals received by division personnel included one Navy Cross, at least eight Silver Stars, more than 60 Bronze Stars, over 50 Navy Commendation Medals, more than 20 Navy Achievement Medals, over 10 Vietnamese Crosses of Gallantry, and close to 100 Purple Hearts.

Editor’s note: River Division 593 got its name “Iron Butterfly” from their shoulder patch designed to look like a California Condor. The “Navy Times” had written an article about River Division 593 and in it referred to the unit as the “Iron Butterfly.” Because they were in the news quite often, the name stuck.


source; www.milmag.com

Cuba, Venezuela Could Host Russian Bombers

Cuba, Venezuela Could Host Russian Bombers

MOSCOW - A Russian air force general said that the country could base some strategic bombers in Cuba or on an island offered by Venezuela, news agencies reported, but a Kremlin official quickly said the military had been speaking only hypothetically.

The U.S. and Russia have been trying to reset their relationship, severely strained over U.S. plans to position missile defense elements in Poland and the Czech Republic and by Russia's invasion of U.S. ally Georgia last year.

Russia has nothing to gain strategically from basing long-range bombers within relatively short range of U.S. shores, independent military analyst Alexander Golts said, calling the military statement a retaliatory gesture aimed at hitting back after U.S. ships patrolled Black Sea waters near Georgia.

The chief of staff of Russia's long range aviation, Maj. Gen. Anatoly Zhikharev, was quoted by Interfax and RIA Novosti news agencies as saying Saturday that Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez had offered Russia to use an airbase on La Orchila island.

"Chavez has offered us a whole island with an airfield, which we can use as a temporary base for strategic bombers," Zhikharev was quoted as saying. "If there is a corresponding political decision, then the use of the island ... by the Russian Air Force is possible."

Interfax also quoted Zhikharev as saying that Cuba has four or five air bases with runways long enough to host the Russian long-range planes.

"This is possible with Cuba," it quoted Zhikharev as saying. "If the two heads of state display such a political will, we are ready to fly there."

But Kremlin spokesman Alexei Pavlov told The Associated Press that "the military is speaking about technical possibilities, that's all. If there will be a development of the situation, then we can comment."

Mike Hammer, spokesman for President Barack Obama's National Security Council, said, "We do not comment on hypotheticals."

Officials at both Venezuela's presidential administration and Defense Ministry refused immediate comment and Cuban officials could not be reached for comment.

But Venezuela's President Hugo Chavez said in a televised speech Sept. 7, "All these long-range planes and boats must have a place to stop. Where are they going to stop? Are they going to stop in territory belonging to countries that don't like them? No. They'll look for their strategic allies."

"Russia will be welcome - the air fleet or the naval fleet," Chavez said. "We're Russia's strategic ally."

Venezuela and Cuba, traditionally fierce U.S. foes, have close political and energy relations with Russia, which has been working to reassert itself as a military force. Russia resumed regular long-range bomber patrols in 2007 after a 15-year hiatus.

Venezuela hosted two Russian Tu-160 bombers in September for training flights and later joined Russian warships for exercises in the Caribbean.

The bombers visit marked the first time Russian strategic bombers landed in the Western Hemisphere since the Cold War times, when the Soviet aircraft sometimes made stopovers in Cuba.

In the October 1962 Cuban Missile Crisis, Soviet nuclear missiles stationed in Cuba pushed the world to the brink of nuclear conflict after U.S. President John F. Kennedy announced their presence to the world. After a tense week of diplomacy, Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev removed the missiles.

The military analyst Golts said basing Russian bombers in Venezuela or Cuba "has no military sense. The bombers don't need any base."

He said the bombers are considered strategic because they are capable of reaching an attacking range of the United States from Russia without the need for stopovers.

Moscow and the new Obama administration have appeared to want to mend their relations,

U.S. plans initiated under former President George W. Bush to put elements of a missile defense system in Poland and the Czech Republic had particularly irked Russia, although the United States insists they are intended to counter potential future threats from Iran.

Russia has welcomed Obama's apparently more cautious approach to the divisive issue.

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton met Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov in Geneva earlier this month to push a symbolic red "reset" button, another sign of the desire for a clean slate.

Cuban authorities made no comment last summer when a Moscow newspaper reported that Russia could send nuclear bombers to the island. While neither confirming nor denying the report, ailing former President Fidel Castro at the time praised his brother President Raul Castro for maintaining a "dignified silence" on the report and said that Cuba was not obligated to offer the United States an explanation.

© Copyright 2009 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

source: www.military.com

Saturday, March 14, 2009

Iraqi Army to Get Abrams Tanks From US

In a turnaround from previous policy, the Iraqi army will acquire 140 advanced American-made battle tanks with help from the U.S. military over the next 18 months.

The deal, announced this week by U.S. military officials in Iraq, was called a "major step in the force modernization of [the Iraqi army's] armored units."

The M1A1SA Abrams tanks are expected to be acquired by the Iraqis in groups of 35 over the next 18 months. Officials with the Multi-National Security Transition Command in Iraq did not answer questions about whether the Iraqis paid for the tanks under the Foreign Military Sales program or they were donated by the U.S. military.

Iraqi and American officials will be working on "delivery, fielding and training," Charles Campbell, a program coordinator with MNSTCI, was quoted as saying in an Army news release. "The first [Iraqi] regiment will begin full-scale training in December of 2010. From there, we would instruct and train on how to support and sustain these tanks."

Officials said the Abrams program includes training for Iraqi tank crews, spare parts logistics, and "a security agreement for sensitive weapons and communications systems featured in the M1A1SA Abrams."

The move to equip the Iraqis with the tanks is the latest effort by the American military to reshape the Iraqi force. Humvees are now widely used among Iraqi forces, as are other vehicles in use by the American military. And most symbolically, the Iraqi military has adopted the American M-16 rifle as the replacement to the ubiquitous AK-47.

According to defense officials, the Iraqi army has plans to buy around 125,000 M-16s from manufacturer Colt.

That move sparked debate about how much the new Iraqi army should be modeled after the American force. Some officials said the Iraqis should be trained to better use their own equipment, while others have argued that the American-made weapons represent an advancement that will help the nascent force mature.

When the M-16 deal was announced last year, American officials were reported to have denied Iraqi requests for advanced arms such as the Abrams tank and Apache helicopters, partly out of fear that they could fall into the hands of insurgents.

The cost of an Abrams tank is estimated at around $4 million, according to the Army.

The militaries of other nations in the region -- including Egypt, Saudi Arabia and Kuwait -- also have Abrams tanks in their arsenals.

The Iraqi army under Saddam Hussein had relied on a mostly aging fleet of Russian T-72 tanks.

The Abrams' technology, "related to the gunnery and air filtration systems, helps the new tank perform much better than the previous Iraqi fleet," an official with General Dynamics -- which manufactures the Abrams tank -- was quoted as saying in the release.

© Copyright 2009 Stars and Stripes. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

source: www.military.com

Spending Bill Bars US Cluster Bomb Exports

March 13, 2009

WASHINGTON - The big spending bill that President Barack Obama signed this week includes a prohibition on most exports of cluster bombs, which can kill for years after their use in wars.

Cluster bombs spread small bomblets, which greatly expands the kill zone. Many of the strewn weapons fail to explode until much later. Often they go off only after unsuspecting civilians pick them up.

The weapons' latest use in war was by the Israeli air force during its 2006 war in Lebanon against Hezbollah militants.

The U.S. Air Force used them in NATO's Balkan war in 1999 and again in the "shock and awe" attacks that began the Iraq war in 2003. The bombs were stopped because of the danger they caused for U.S. soldiers as well as Iraqi civilians.

Sens. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., and Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., have introduced further legislation that would prohibit not only the export of the weapons but their use by the U.S. military.

While the amendment to the $410 billion spending bill that Obama signed Wednesday mentions no time limit for the ban, congressional aides said it probably would be considered permanent by the military.

Under the law, the cluster bombs may not be transferred without guarantees from the potential customer that they would not be used where civilians were known to be present.

For the past year, the U.S. military has been under a similar ban on spending money to export cluster bombs. The amendment's sponsors expect it will be treated as a permanent ban.

"We hope this would lead to permanent change of policy, including the use of these weapons," David Carle, Leahy's spokesman, said Thursday.

© Copyright 2009 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

source: www.military.com

Off-road MRAPs a Hot Topic in Congress

WASHINGTON -- By the end of the year, troops should be driving a new vehicle while on patrols in Afghanistan. But whether they're still driving it two years from now remains to be seen.

Defense contractors last week submitted their first prototypes of the new MRAP All-Terrain Vehicle, designed to be as safe but lighter and more agile than the Mine-Resistant Ambush Protected trucks which dramatically reduced casualties from roadside bombs in Iraq.

Army and Marine Corps officials detailed those plans during a Thursday hearing before the House Appropriations Committee.

Pentagon planners put out a request for the new vehicles last fall and hope to field the armored vehicle by the end of 2009.

Lawmakers offered support for the plans, but questioned whether the vehicles will come too late, after the heaviest fighting of the year.

"We were not ready in Iraq, and consequently we went in there with the wrong vehicles," said Rep. Carolyn Kilpatrick, D-Mich. "I'm hoping we don't repeat that same mistake in Afghanistan."

Nearly 12,000 MRAPs have been put into service in the last two years, but fewer than 1,800 of them are in Afghanistan due to their impracticality on the nation's narrow, crumbling roadways.

Improvised explosive devices have killed 32 coalition troops in January and February, compared with 10 during the same period in 2008.

The prototype M-ATVs provided to the Defense Department last week weigh about 10 tons. That is about half the weight of the older MRAPs, but still significantly more than the basic 5-ton Humvee used by Afghanistan troops.

Defense planners also requested the M-ATVs include the blast-defying characteristics that Humvees lack, such as thicker armor and a V-shaped bottom.

Options for commanders

But the Pentagon isn't touting the hybrid as a long-term solution for servicemember safety, or even the only short-term solution.

About 882 redesigned, lighter MRAPs will be built before the M-ATV can be mass produced. Updated Humvee armor kits will be fielded in coming months. And the long-range development of the Joint Light Tactical Vehicle -- set to replace the Humvee in 2015 -- won't be affected by the new truck's performance, military officials said.

Marine Corps Lt. Gen. George Flynn, deputy commandant for combat development and integration, told lawmakers Thursday that the goal is to give commanders on the ground as many options as possible, allowing them to use different convoy configurations as missions change.

But that means the M-ATV program and its potential $3 billion price tag could produce just a few thousand new trucks that will be obsolete within a few years, lawmakers said.

Ranking defense subcommittee member Rep. Bill Young, R-Fla., expressed concern that in two years, commanders might decide the M-ATVs don't fit mission needs just as they've decided the MRAPs are too heavy for Afghanistan now.

But Army Deputy Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. J.D. Thurman noted the MRAPs will still play a strategic role, just not one as prominent as it has in Iraq.

Questions about need

Loren Thompson, chief operating officer of the libertarian think tank Lexington Institute, said the cost of rapidly fielding another new vehicle might seem a steep price, but it's a priority the services are backing.

"I'm not sure the [M-ATV] is essential for the troops' mission, but it may be essential to keep political support for the war effort," he said.

While IED attacks are up in Afghanistan, the opportunities for insurgents to build and hide them aren't as numerous there as they were in Iraq, Thompson said. But the political fallout of not responding to a lesser IED threat in Afghanistan could be damaging to the new administration.

"And the Pentagon has a tendency to throw scads of money at problems anyway," he said.

Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments senior fellow Dakota Wood said the plan isn't fiscally responsible, but that neither were plans to spend nearly $20 billion to rapidly field the MRAPs in Iraq.

"It's worth whatever you feel like the priority is at the moment," he said. "The MRAPs were seen as a necessity to stop the bleeding. And with the upswing of IED attacks in Afghanistan, there's some of the same urgency."

But Wood said he's not surprised the M-ATVs are viewed as a short-term fix for the specific challenges of Afghanistan. "Once you get into the fight, plans change, and you're not going to wait five or 10 years for something perfect to replace it."

Flynn said he is optimistic the M-ATVs can be fielded on their current schedule. Army officials expect to buy about 2,080 of the new trucks over the next year, although they could raise that number to 10,000 if the need arises.

Pentagon spokeswoman Cheryl Irwin said the MRAP joint program office is expected to finalize vehicle testing this spring, and award the first production contracts for the M-ATV by early summer.

Stripes' Jeff Schogol contributed to this report.

© Copyright 2009 Stars and Stripes. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
source: www.military.com

Obama to Alter Strategy in Afghan War

Obama to Alter Strategy in Afghan War

WASHINGTON - The Obama administration is close to announcing a redrawn strategy for a war in Afghanistan that the president says the United States is not winning, focusing on enlisting Pakistan in the fight against extremism and trimming U.S. expectations for military victory, administration, defense and intelligence officials said.

The White House expects to announce new objectives for the flagging war as soon as next week that place an onus on next-door Pakistan to contain extremism, defense and administration officials said Thursday.

President Barack Obama was expected to explain the redrawn U.S. objectives to NATO allies when he attends a NATO summit in Europe next month.

The in-house review coordinated by the White House National Security Council lays out objectives over three years to five years, although that doesn't necessarily mean the U.S. military could leave in that time, defense officials said.

Poll: How should Obama approach the Afghan War?

Podcast: Boots on the Ground -- From Afghanistan

The White House objectives were expected to roughly parallel 15 goals contained in a 20-page classified report to the White House from the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Among them were getting rid of terrorist safe havens in Pakistan and adopting a regional approach to reducing the threat of terrorism and extremism in both countries.

The U.S. goal in Afghanistan must be to protect Kabul's fragile government from collapsing under pressure from the Taliban - a goal that can only be achieved by securing Pakistan's cooperation, increasing substantially the size of Afghanistan's national security forces and boosting economic aid in the region, according to senior military and intelligence officials.

"We're just about done," Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Adm. Mike Mullen said in an interview with PBS' "The Charlie Rose Show" on Thursday.

The review addresses "the safe haven in Pakistan, making sure that Afghanistan doesn't provide a capability in the long run or an environment in which al-Qaida could return or the Taliban could return," Mullen said, as well as the need for stability, economic development and better governance in Afghanistan, and the development of the Afghan armed forces.

An administration official said that although the review was not complete, one thrust was that Pakistan needed to recognize that combating extremism was in its own interest as well as that of U.S. and NATO fighting forces across the border in Afghanistan. The official, like others interviewed for this story, spoke on condition of anonymity because the review was not complete.

The review overseen by former CIA analyst Bruce Riedel drew on several generally bleak internal government assessments of the war done over the past six months. People familiar with those accounts sum up the conclusions much as Obama himself described the Afghanistan war in a New York Times interview last week: The United States is not winning.

Gen. David Petraeus, head of U.S. Central Command, and Richard Holbrooke, the U.S. special envoy to Afghanistan and Pakistan, met privately on Thursday with more than a dozen senators. Although the session was confidential, it was part of the administration's effort to recruit support for a trimmed-down U.S. mission in the war begun by former President George W. Bush following the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

It is not clear whether Obama will approve additional forces for Afghanistan this year beyond 17,000 he has already dispatched. His ground commander in Afghanistan, Gen. David McKiernan, has requested up to 30,000 troops.

The White House review was expected to frame U.S. objectives in two major categories: strategic regional goals for stability in impoverished Afghanistan and nuclear-armed Pakistan and smaller-scale warfighting goals for the growing U.S. military commitment in Afghanistan.

Broadly speaking, the Obama administration was expected to endorse a doctrine of counterinsurgency that has military and civilian components and that scales back U.S. expectations for Afghan democracy and self-sufficiency. A main theme is the premise that the military alone cannot win the war, officials said.

The review was expected to focus on containing the Taliban and the proliferation of lesser-known militant groups, providing a greater sense of security and stability for Afghan civilians and increasing the size and proficiency of the Afghan armed forces.

"I would say that, at a minimum, the mission is to prevent the Taliban from retaking power against a democratically elected government in Afghanistan and thus turning Afghanistan, potentially, again, into a haven for al-Qaida and other extremist groups," Defense Secretary Robert Gates said in an interview with National Public Radio this week.

Part of the strategy would be purely military, as the 17,000 additional troops Obama has approved for Afghanistan this year attest. Their role is to face off against extremists in the busy spring and summer fighting season and buy time for less tangible counterinsurgency tactics to take hold.

Administration and military leaders have given a glimpse into one such tactic, describing ways that Afghan and U.S. leaders might co-opt or pay off mid- and lower-level Taliban and other insurgents in rough imitation of a successful strategy to blunt the insurgency in Iraq.

© Copyright 2009 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

source: www.military.com

GAO Highlights DoD Cost Overruns

WASHINGTON - Costs are likely to keep growing for two of the Pentagon's biggest weapons programs as the military pushes to field fighter jets and high tech Army units even before fully proving the technology, according to Government Accountability Office reports released Thursday.

The reports by the government watchdog agency concluded the Army is moving forward with the $159 billion Future Combat Systems program even though some of its technology is unproven and over budget. The Joint Strike Fighter program, which could ultimately cost $1 trillion to build and maintain roughly 2,500 planes, will face even higher costs if the Pentagon accelerates the program while testing continues.

The two are among the largest weapons contracts ever awarded by the Pentagon, and are potential targets for budget cuts as pressure grows on the military to lower spending as the government devotes trillions of dollars to the financial crisis.

President Barack Obama's overall budget, released last month, also pledged to conduct rigorous reviews of weapons programs to make sure their technologies are proven before they go into production. A bill introduced by Sens. Carl Levin, D.-Mich. and John McCain, R.-Ariz., would set similar requirements. Details on the budget for specific Pentagon programs are expected in April.

Future Combat Systems would outfit Army brigades with tools meant to incorporate high speed communications and unmanned sensors with troops on the battlefield. The program includes flying sensors that take video, robots that hunt for bombs, satellites and giant cannons that can hit targets precisely from miles away. Boeing Co. is the lead contractor on the program, with SAIC Inc. also playing a large role.

But the GAO pointed to "immaturity" in the program, such as a shortage of real-life tests and unknowns about the effectiveness of the high speed communication networks it will rely on. It also recommended that Congress not approve full funding for Future Combat Systems, also known as FCS, until the military gives a complete picture of the budgets involved.

"FCS costs are likely to increase at the same time as competition for funds intensifies between near- and far-term needs in DOD and between DOD and other federal agencies," the report concluded.

Army spokesman Paul Mehney said the program's technology was "at a maturity level appropriate for a program at this stage of development." Boeing said in a statement that most of Future Combat Systems' technologies are well proven and that some, such as an early version of the robots that search out roadside bombs, are already in use in Iraq and Afghanistan.

"We continue to successfully execute the FCS program to the Army's plan," the company said.

The Joint Strike Fighter, also known as the F-35 and built by lead contractor Lockheed Martin Corp., is designed to replace many of the current warplanes flown by the Marine Corps, Navy and Air Force. A total of 2,456 planes will be bought for roughly $300 billion, with another $760 billion expected to be required to maintain the planes during their lifespans.

The GAO reported that the Pentagon expects to step up plans to buy the planes even as they continue to undergo testing to uncover potential problems. By 2015, just a year after all flight tests are expected to be finished, the military will have purchased 684 planes. The accelerated buying schedule will have added $33 billion in costs by that time.

Buying jets while they are still being tested "does not seem prudent," the report states.

In its response, the Defense Department wrote that some of the GAO's conclusions are premature since the president's budget has not yet been formalized. That means its findings are "largely conjectural."

Lockheed Martin said in a statement that "the overall health of the F-35 program is sound in all areas."

© Copyright 2009 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

source: www.military.com

Thursday, March 12, 2009

Corps Sees Dramatic Spike in Suicides

While the Army fights a high-profile battle against suicides, the Marine Corps is quietly upping its effort to combat the malaise following the worst year for suicides in more than a decade.

Forty-one Marines committed suicide in 2008 while another 146 tried but failed. If all had been successful, that's pretty close to an entire infantry company trying to take its own life.

"This is the highest rate of suicide since 1995 and reflects an unacceptable loss of life for the Marine Corps," Assistant Commandant of the Marine Corps Gen. James F. Amos said in a recent Marine Administrative message. "Each and every Marine is critical to our Corps and our mission."

In response to its spiking suicide rate, the Army had called for a force-wide stand-down day in which suicide prevention training will take center stage.

The Corps, meanwhile, has directed all Marines to participate in a service-wide training sometime this month.

"We are actively engaged in prevention measures and early identification of problems that may increase the risk of suicide. Leaders at all levels are concerned about the increase in the number of suicides," the Corps' chief suicide prevention officer, Navy Cmdr. Aaron Werbel, said in a prepared statement forwarded to Military.com.

The Army numbers are staggering: 138 suicides last year and possibly up to 42 in the first two months of 2009 pending investigations.

The Marine Corps numbers are not as harrowing, but show the time away from the range is warranted.

The number of suicides in the Corps increased for the second straight year in 2008, and for the first time since the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan began the majority of those who killed themselves had served downrange.

"While this may simply be due to increasing proportions of total Marines with a history of deployment, further investigations into possible relationships between these factors are ongoing," Werbel said. "Analyses to date have not demonstrated any actionable findings between suicide and deployment history."

The number of Marines who killed themselves while serving in a combat zone tied the previous high set in 2004 at seven.

And it's happening across the Corps.

Only two of the 41 suicides were females, but the trend cut across other barriers. Fifteen noncommissioned officers and two officers took their own life.

The majority of suicides were gun-shot wounds, but 12 Marines hung themselves last year. Most were white, but two black and four Hispanic Marines also committed suicide.

For the first time since 2001, the number of suicides in the Corps is roughly equal to the average among civilians at 19 per 100,000.

Marines, however, are far more efficient at killing themselves. For every three Marines that attempt suicide, one proves successful while the number is at least eight to one for civilians.

The recent spike is especially troubling for the Corps after it experienced a steady decline in suicides from 1997 to 2006. Three years ago, the Corps saw a suicide rate of roughly 14 per 100,000.

That was during some of the fiercest fighting Marines had experience in decades as the Corps struggled with insurgents and terrorists in Iraq's Anbar province.

The last three months of 2006 alone saw 288 American troops killed in Iraq, according to online statistics.

Today, Iraq is preparing for a drawdown of American troops and the Army has more soldiers killing themselves than dying in combat. The Corps is implementing updated training hoping it doesn't follow the same path.

Part of the required training is a slide show that educates Marines on the warning signs of suicide and how to look out for their fellow leathernecks.

Werbel said many of the factors leading to suicide are uniform across the services: problems in romantic relationships, physical health, performance and job dissatisfaction, and pending legal or administrative action.

All Marine commanders ranked colonel and above are required to produce an instructional video to be shown to their commands alongside the Corps-provided slide show.

Werbel acknowledged that refreshing the Corps' suicide prevention training and partnering with outside organizations with expertise in combating suicide might not be the quick fix some hope to see.

"Suicide prevention does not lend itself to a quick or easy solution," he said. "There is no single answer or action for suicide prevention."

© Copyright 2009 Military.com. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

source: www.military.com

Tuesday, March 10, 2009

US Claims China Harassed Navy Ship

The Defense Department charged Monday that five Chinese ships shadowed and maneuvered dangerously close to a U.S. Navy vessel in an apparent attempt to harass the American crew.

Defense officials in the Obama administration said the incident Sunday followed several days of "increasingly aggressive" acts by Chinese ships in the region. The incident took place in international waters in the South China Sea, about 75 miles (120 kilometers) south of Hainan Island.


source: www.military.com